I don't read classics as a leisurely pastime. I don't mind studying them in English or literature classes, but when it comes to my own hobby of reading, I don't do classics. HOWEVER, over the past couple of weeks, I've been reading Emily Bronte's 'Wuthering Heights' and last night (actually, just as the clock struck midnight), I finished it. And straight away, I messaged my friend to let them know of this accomplishment, because believe me, this is actually a very proud moment for me, not because I thought reading this book was a challenge (it was surprisingly quite an easy read). It is an accomplishment because I have borrowed 'Wuthering Heights' three times, but only read as far as the title, so the fact that I've actually opened the book, let alone finished it, is huge. When I borrowed the book this time round, I was determined and my mum's very "encouraging" (sarcasm) words of:
Me: Mum, I'm going to read 'Wuthering Heights.'
Mum: Oh [pause]. You won't like it.
Me: You never know.
Mum: Mmm [pause]. I'm not sure... It's very wordy. (She says, as if I don't study English and literature at a university level- thanks mum)
But that doubt made me even more determined, because you see, I'm an extremely stubborn person, so if someone thinks I can't do something, I feel even more compelled to do it to prove them wrong. In fact, the exact message I sent to my friend when I told them I finished the book was:
Me: Just finished 'Wuthering Heights'- I did it!!!!
Him: Knew you could do it (how come my mum didn't have that attitude?)
Me: I proved all the disbelievers wrong!
During the reading process, a few of my other friends who actually read classics as a normal thing, were really excited and proud of me, were like: "you can then start with 'Jane Eyre' next!"
Um... no. Even though I actually enjoyed 'Wuthering Heights,' I have not suddenly converted into a classics lover and I do not feel compelled to read any more classics unless it's for studies. I know this is very narrow minded of me, but there are so many other things that I want to read and I don't care that many of those reads are predictable and shallow. The only reason I read this in the first place was because in 'The Sky is Everywhere,' the main character, Lenny's, favourite book is 'Wuthering Heights.' Lenny was obsessed with it and loved it as much as I loved my favourite book and I felt I owed it to my love for 'The Sky is Everywhere.' This means that next time I read 'The Sky is Everywhere' (I think it will be for the ninth time now), I can actually say I've read 'Wuthering Heights' and understand where Lenny is coming from.
As I briefly said before, I actually enjoyed reading it and contrary to what my mum said, it wasn't wordy. The language was beautifully written, and easy to understand and follow, which I think is partly due to the fact that it is written in the first person. The only part I didn't understand was whenever the character Joseph spoke, as his dialogue was written phonetically to his accent, which I tried to read aloud, but I still didn't know what that guy was going on about, and the things I did pick up on, it just sounded like he was shaking his head at people and saying that they will go to Hell for behaving in whatever way they were behaving in, so I just skipped his disapproving speeches. But the rest of the novel was great and was completely different to what I was expecting. What many people made it out to be, it sounded like it was going to be some epic love story between Heathcliff and Catherine, however, I interpreted it completely different.
Yes, Heathcliff and Catherine loved each other, BUT I would not say that is what the entire book is about. It's just one of the many things that is going on, and if anything, the main theme of the story is probably about abusive and possessive relationships. The events of the story are the recounts of the nanny/ maid, of her telling the new tenant of Thrushcross Grange about these people and their lives and relationships with each other. I don't want to give the story away and it is not a simple straightforward story of love which is easy to give a brief summary about. It's just not what you expect it to be, so if haven't read it and are curious about it, then I do think it is a good book to read. I personally don't see why there is a massive fuss about it, but it is enjoyable to read because you do get really annoyed with the characters and hate a lot of them too. There is a lot of passionate emotions that emanates through the language; there is so much torment and despair. It is also written in an interesting and unique structure, about the lives of the different generations of these linked families, which I didn't know it had, until I read it. For example, there are two Catherine's- the original Catherine that people always go on about with Heathcliff (I don't really understand why- I saw her as a pretty secondary character and definitely more of a mediator of other people's actions than anything else) and then there is her daughter, Cathy, who I found as a more dominant character and I thought who was part of a more interesting generation to read about. (Is it strange that every time I talk about the "first generation" and "second generation", I instantly think about 'Skins') Another praise for the book though, is that I did really like the ending, as, after all the time disliking so many of the people (especially second generation Linton, who was a snivelling crybaby- yes, I know that sounds harsh, but I really felt no sympathy towards this absolute brat) I got what I wanted at the end (okay, that makes me sound like a brat now...oops).